Following on from my last "Most Wanted" post, another example of where
misidentification can easily occur is between common and reticulated dragonets.
Indeed, following discussions with fellow species hunter Ross Johnston about
some of the dragonets we caught last year at the Cornish Lure Festival, I had
some doubts about the ones I caught being commons as I assumed at the time.
Oops! Subsequently I've been doing a bit of research so that I can decide if my
initial identification was correct and so that future dragonet captures can be
properly identified.
To start with adult males of both species are
distinct from the females. Like the male cuckoo wrasse, adult male common and
reticulated dragonets are quite unmistakable as they have bright, striking
markings.
Two superb images depicting the typical male dorsal fin patterns of both species. Common dragonet on the left and reticulated dragonet on the right |
Obviously from the above identifying adult
males is not an issue. Females of both species and juvenile males too however
can easily be mistaken due to their much less colourful appearance and indeed
many of the different descriptions of the colouration of them I've found are
somewhat contradictory. In fact I believe that some of the photos that can be
found online are mislabelled in a similar way to some photos of gobies. Also in
relation to colouration, various sources state that the saddle markings found on
their backs can be used to distinguish them because the common dragonet only has
three of these whilst the reticulated dragonet has four, the borders of those on
the reticulated dragonet also being much more clearly defined. Again in many of
the photos I've found online these saddles aren't clear or the labelling of the
photos contradicts the number of saddles or how pronounced the borders are. Here
are a couple of images that do match the general descriptions of their
colouration.
A common dragonet. Pretty bland and the three saddles aren't really obvious due to the fairly mottled colouration. |
A reticulated dragonet. Slightly more exciting with some nice turquoise markings and the four saddles are easy to see and reddish brown in colour. |
Whilst these example photos above seem to best
match the common aspects of most descriptions given other photographs show that
not every dragonet is so easy to identify using colouration alone. With this
becoming apparent whilst researching I have tried to find some anatomical
differences and thankfully there does seem to be a few ways to reliably
distinguish between the two that do not rely on colouration or
markings.
Size can be used to identify which species is
which in larger specimens as reticulated dragonets only grow to about 11cm so
any exceeding this length must be common dragonets as they can grow up to about
25cm.
Applying this simple rule means that this must be a female common dragonet and indeed it is one of specimen proportions. |
Snout length can also be used. The common
dragonet has a much longer snout being two to three times the diameter of their
eyes where as the snout of a reticulated dragonet is usually only slightly
longer than the diameter of their eyes.
Dragonets have a group of small sharp prickly
spines at the edge of their preoperculum. They use this as a defensive
mechanism. When threatened they flair their gill plates and these spines stand
out giving anything that touches them a rather unpleasant surprise. Common
dragonets have four spines in total, one faces forward whilst the remaining
three face upwards and backwards. Reticulated dragonets only have three spines
and all face upwards and backwards.*
Finally a count of the rays in the second
dorsal fin can be used. When doing this bear in mind that the final ray in both
species is branched into two so you have to count both of these as one! Common
dragonets normally have nine rays whilst reticulated dragonets have ten.
Occasionally however common dragonets may have eight or ten so this identifying
feature should be used in conjunction with others above if the count is ten.
There is a third species of dragonet found in
U.K waters, the spotted dragonet. It's another small member of the dragonet
family, only growing to 14cm, and is normally found offshore in very deep water
so the chances of ever catching one are extremely remote.
Easily identifiable due to their electric blue spots. |
I'm fairly confident now that the dragonets I
caught last year were all common dragonets and that armed with the above
knowledge I'll be able to positively identify any dragonets I catch in the
future. A bit like my problem of differentiating between common gobies and sand
gobies last year this is an area of species identification I'm determined to
fully master that will of course require catching more dragonets to examine and
also photograph. Like I need another excuse to species hunt!
Tight lines, Scott.
*Update: Further research has revealed that this forth spine is not visible to the naked eye. It can however be detected my running a fingernail back along the gill plate towards the other three spines. If it is present your fingernail will catch on it. I have applied this simple test to all dragonets I have caught since writing this post and all of them possessed the forth spine confirming them as the common variety.
*Update: Further research has revealed that this forth spine is not visible to the naked eye. It can however be detected my running a fingernail back along the gill plate towards the other three spines. If it is present your fingernail will catch on it. I have applied this simple test to all dragonets I have caught since writing this post and all of them possessed the forth spine confirming them as the common variety.
nice article on dragonets.
ReplyDeletedo you have an email address as I would like to find out more about this species
Click the link at the end of the "About me" section at the top left of the page. :-)
ReplyDelete